Achieving Responsible Sourcing, climate, and biodiversity commitments is a challenge, within the context of ever-changing expectations from consumers, shareholders, and campaign NGOs, as the industry progresses and advances.
This event aims to help companies make informed decisions to strengthen and evolve their responsible sourcing and wider sustainability commitment approach, by learning and being inspired by others. By bringing together key stakeholders, including non-profits, the voice of Indigenous people and local communities (IPLC), academic, finance, and influencer organisations, and company sustainability teams involved with company sustainability commitments. We will hear from a selection of organisations, including, Mighty Earth, Forest Peoples Programme, Earthworm Foundation, Rainforest Alliance, Rainforest Foundation UK, and John Lewis/Waitrose sharing their Forest Positive approach and alignment with RSPO certification and the WWF Palm Oil Scorecard.
We’ll provide the opportunity to share and discuss knowledge, experience, and learning related to rainforest conservation by IPLC and their critical role in supporting company sustainability commitments. We’ll link nature-based solutions and climate commitments to responsible sourcing of natural raw materials (e.g. palm oil, rubber, timber, pulp and paper products, coconut, cocoa, coffee, minerals, and aqua-culture….) and sourcing landscape and forest-positive approaches. Buying from suppliers not deforesting now needs to be complemented by actively protecting standing rainforests in sourcing landscapes.
Below is an overview of the agenda:
Please register to participate by emailing info@fundforests.org
Our thanks to the Earthworm Foundation for their financial support for this event
Our recent webinar explored why conservation by Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities is critical for truly Responsible Sourcing.
Responsible Sourcing has evolved and buying from suppliers not deforesting now needs to be complemented by actively protecting standing rainforests in sourcing landscapes. The best way to achieve this is by empowering Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities, the best guardians of the forest for achieving climate and biodiversity goals.
Partnerships and collaboration are critical, our panel included Kristin Urquiza from Mighty Earth, the global advocacy organization, one of our donors, Samuel Coxlee-Gammage from Waitrose, and the John Lewis Partnership, and Paulinus Kristianto, from Conservation Action Network Borneo, our grantee for Lesan River Forest and Rachel Kent from the Forest Conservation Fund.
Whether you are involved with sourcing forest-risk commodities including palm oil, cocoa, rubber, pulp and paper, timber, soy, coconut, and minerals, or simply want to learn more about rainforest conversation, the recording shares insights from our panel. This includes how easy and flexible our approach is to support a company to be ‘Forest Positive’, compensating for a plantation footprint used to grow your commodity with an equivalent forest conservation footprint to create a forest-positive supply chain: linking responsible production with active forest protection.
Our thanks to the Earthworm Foundation for hosting the Zoom Event and to Charlotte Opal for moderating.
Collaboration is a cornerstone of our approach, connecting donors to 'Keep Rainforests Standing' in threatened sourcing landscapes, by empowering the Indigenous People and Local Communities.
80% of our income is directed to the projects, leaving 20% for the operational budget including satellite monitoring and technology support for patrols and biodiversity monitoring, with little budget for our communications.
So, we are so excited to share this amazing video, created by Violet our volunteer, who has summarised our work so impactfully, and we hope you are as uplifted and smile as we have when watching.
Stingless Bees and Community Livelihood Improvement in Mului Forest, more information here
Strengthening the Indigenous Communitys’s Role in Facing Climate Change, Energy Transition and Carbon Trading, more information here
Dabong Mangroves received their first donation this year, from the Global Shrimp Forum, a non-profit established by the Aquaculture Stewardship Council, Shrimp Insights and Contango, for the warm-water shrimp industry.
The funds were from the surplus budget for their annual meeting in 2022 and we were so pleased to have the opportunity to share a short video ‘thank you message’ at this year's conference, held in September. Attended by over 520 delegates from 290 companies and 41 countries representing farmers, feed companies, technology suppliers, service providers, processors, exporters, importers, wholesalers, retailers, civil society, and other industry stakeholders.
For more information and to see the short video please visit the Dabong Mangroves page of our website.
Our grantee for Tanoe-ehy Forest, Prof. Inza Kone of CSRS, the Swiss Centre for Scientific Research is sharing insights on ‘Community Empowerment for the Conservation of Endangered primates and their habitat in South-eastern Côte d'Ivoire - The role of companies’. The recording is available here and thanks to the Earthworm Foundation for providing this opportunity to share our work.
JULY 21, 2022: We are thrilled to announce that one of our first projects, the Mului Customary Forest on the Indonesian island of Borneo, has won Indonesia’s highest environmental honour! Thank you to donors PZ Cussons and the John Lewis Partnership for their support for this indigenous-led rainforest conservation project. The photo below is from yesterday’s ceremony in Jakarta, with the Deputy Minister of Forestry & the Environment, our own Arif Wijaya, and Pak Zidan, leader of the Mului people. Read the release here.
OUR FOREST POSITIVE WEBINAR
At the end of June 2021 we hosted a webinar with Earthworm Foundation on why we need to GO forest positive to stop deforestation.
Over four million hectares of primary forest were lost in 2020, up 12% from 2019. With agriculture being the main driver of deforestation it’s becoming increasingly clear that farm certification isn’t fit-for-purpose as a tool to conserve forests. Fortunately, there is a new movement to link the global market with local forest conservation initiatives in the landscapes from which they source key ingredients. Companies are finding ways to go #ForestPositive , not just to avoid deforestation, but to pro-actively protect forests in partnership with indigenous people, local communities, and even growers themselves.
It turns out it’s neither complicated nor expensive for companies to support the global movement to protect half our planet by investing in forest conservation. So, why do we need to be forest positive to stop deforestation? How does forest positive work in practice? And how can companies support new initiatives to conserve the millions of hectares of vulnerable forests sitting outside protected areas? The webinar tackled these questions.
You can view a recording of the webinar below and find the slide deck here.
Speakers:
Lisel Alamilla - former Minister of Forestry, Fisheries, and Sustainable Development, Belize
Sandra Doig – Head of Sustainability, Grupo Palmas, Peru
Samuel Lee-Gammage – Ethics & Sustainability Manager, Waitrose / John Lewis Partnership
Moderator Charlotte Opal, Executive Director, Forest Conservation Fund
Our Latest on Twitter
-
Our Q1 newsletter just been shared, link in comments or subscribe via our website, at bottom of each page. I you ha… https://t.co/edzvuFfygo
-
Maniti Promise Forest, Peru, was at risk of clearance for palm oil until acquired by Grupo Palmas, who are working… https://t.co/GPNrYvjFug
-
‘Mother trees’ Ancestral Eagle Forest, Philippines, tall old-growth trees with vast root systems connected to hundr… https://t.co/mOfMopcQVw
-
Helping companies protect our remaining rainforests: Lessons learned from community-led conservation in Southeast A… https://t.co/YlmA68msh4
-
Our role is to empower local indigenous communities to protect their forest, heritage, way of life, livelihoods. Th… https://t.co/VCT257OSGL
NEWS
The FCF Launch Event
Speakers
Richard McLellan - former head of WWF Global Forest and Trade Network and FCF Board Chair
Anggita Paramesti - Indonesia Project Manager, Forest Conservation Fund
Bastien Sachet - CEO, Earthworm Foundation and FCF Board member
Simon Lord - Head of Sustainability for Sime Darby Plantations and FCF Board member
Caroline Reynolds - Head of Category, PZ Cussons
Inza Koné - Director of the Swiss Center for Scientific Research in the Ivory Coast and FCF Grants Committee Chair
Moderator
Charlotte Opal – Executive Director of the Forest Conservation Fund
In celebration of World Rainforest Day, we officially launched the Forest Conservation Fund!
We discussed the incredible opportunity we have to get over one billion hectares of tropical forests under protection by communities, civil society and private land holders.
With ambitious goals like protecting 30% of nature by 2030 and 50% by 2050 gaining more support, we are presented with a challenge: how to get more areas under protection? How to use agribusinesses with tropical forest footprints as a vehicle for change and transformation? How to engage passionate individuals and groups on frontlines of conservation, and get funding into the right hands?
We dug into how companies can support the protection of an equivalent area to their tropical forest footprint by channeling funding of $40 per hectare -- less than 2% of their cost of goods -- to conservationists on the ground, and the essential role that forest communities can play in this global movement.
Check out the video below to see the launch in full, and the questions & answers section below that!
YOUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED FROM OUR LAUNCH EVENT
HOW DO YOU ENSURE COMPANIES DON’T USE FCF TO GREENWASH?
Corporate donors and grantees who are private individuals or companies must have No Deforestation policies and not be engaged in land-grabbing or deforestation. We do our own due diligence check using publically-available information and our bank also does its own checks regarding corruption etc., but we appreciate any additional information stakeholders can provide – please do not hesitate to contact us at info (at) earthworm.org.
IF A COMPANY IS OPERATING ON ANCESTRAL COMMUNITY LANDS, IS THIS PART OF THE PROCESS OF INITIATIVES SORTED TO HELP COMMUNITIES SECURE THEIR RIGHTS? OR DO YOU ONLY SUPPORT WORK ON LAND WHERE TENURE IS SECURE AND CLEAR?
Normally the Grantee must have legal use or management rights over the conservation area. However, if a community is still finalizing the process of gaining legal tenure – for instance if it has been recognized at the village level but not yet at the district or federal level – they can be approved and use FCF funding for legal and registration fees.
For companies operating on community lands (even if these are not recognized as such by the government), the rights of the communities to their Free, Prior, and Informed Consent about how their lands are used must be respected. Any land tenure conflicts must be making progress towards resolution. For more details please see sections 1.2 and 1.6 of our Project Eligibility Criteria.
ARE PROJECTS AUTOMATICALLY FUNDED ONCE THEY’RE APPROVED BY THE GRANTS COMMITTEE?
Not necessarily. We are building up our grantee portfolio at the same time as we seek donors, but the interests and needs might not always exactly match. We encourage you to contact us before starting the application process so that we can start to identify potential funders.
ARE INTERNATIONAL NGOS ELIGIBLE TO ACCESS FUNDS THROUGH FCF? OR DO YOU PROVIDE SUPPORT TO LOCALLY-REGISTERED NGOS ONLY?
The Grantee must be a legally-registered organization or an individual residing in the country where they are protecting forest. They can be part of an international organization, as long as they have an office in the country.
WHAT OTHER PLATFORMS / NETWORKS WILL YOU COLLABORATE WITH FOR SCALE?
The FCF will not be directly implementing any conservation projects, so we absolutely rely on partnerships to have the maximum impact. We are aiming to ‘uberize’ conservation by supporting hundreds of local field organisations. Many of them will be nascent organisations supported by more established NGOs, who can even act as fiscal sponsors as the groups build up their organizational capacity. We are therefore keen to build relationships with NGOs who are working with communities to conserve their forests, to direct funding their way.
For funding partnerships, corporate donors would have to meet our due diligence requirements regarding No Deforestation and respect for land rights as outlined in our Project Eligibility Criteria.
WHAT GOVERNANCE SYSTEMS WILL BE NEEDED FOR EFFECTIVE (AND EFFICIENT) ADOPTION BY COMMUNITIES?
Conservation projects generally don’t work unless they have the support of local communities. Communities that support and benefit from the conservation projects can become a second set of forest guards – highlighting the presence of poachers and illegal loggers, for instance. In a good conservation project, forest communities thrive alongside wildlife. Where communities don’t support the conservation project, encroachment into the forest and illegal activities can run rampant.
The most direct way that communities can be involved in the governance of conservation projects is for them to lead the projects themselves, as stewards of their own forests. The FCF aims to work with new conservation projects, where communities may have just gotten legal tenure and where their forest management structures are quite new. In these cases, communities will likely need support from specialized NGOs to build their capacity to manage funds and undertake conservation activities. FCF will support them to use the SMART Conservation Tool and other accessible impact monitoring tools.
Where communities aren’t directly managing the project, the FCF requires the project manager to undertake a social background study to better understand local peoples’ needs and aspirations, and to involve communities in conservation activities. This could take the form of hiring local people as wardens, investing in forest-friendly livelihoods to reduce pressure on forests, community education activities, etc.
HOW DO YOU PLAN ON SUPPORTING PROJECTS TO REDUCE RELIANCE ON DONOR FUNDING -- I.E. DEVELOP AN “EXIT STRATEGY”?
Protected areas need long-term funding – it is rare that sustainable business activities like eco-tourism or non-timber forest products can support all of the conservation costs. FCF will not require projects to ‘graduate’ from our support. However, we will support grantees to diversify their income sources, and plan to set up a knowledge-sharing platform where we can deposit information about how to access carbon markets, set up sustainable forest product businesses, etc.
ARE PROJECTS ALLOWED OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING?
Yes! This is encouraged, as income diversification is a source of project health.
IS THIS FUND ONLY FOR TROPICAL FORESTS?
Not explicitly, but our maximum contribution per hectare ($32 net to the project per hectare per year) means that it is likely that we will only work in tropical forests because conservation costs in temperate countries are likely higher.
IN MANY COUNTRIES THE ONLY CONSERVATION AREAS ALLOWED ARE OWNED BY THE GOVERNMENT – HOW WILL YOU ADJUST YOUR MODEL TO FIT WITH THIS?
Although we know that state-run protected areas desperately need funding – 50-80% of them are underfunded – for now we aren’t set up to allow government organizations to be FCF grantees. We also will be working with forests that have gained their conservation status within the past five years, so most public protected areas are anyway ineligible. However, State-managed areas which gained their protected area status within the past five years, for instance a newly-declared protected area, or an upgrading from a production forest reserve to a protection forest reserve, would be eligible if they are working with a non-State actor on co-management of the area. The organization with the co-management agreement would be the FCF Grantee.
ARE THE PROJECTS FUNDED ONLY LOCATED IN THE SOURCING AREA OF THE DONORS?
Donors will pick the projects that make sense for them. We assume that they will prefer projects directly in their sourcing landscapes, but if there are supply chain links with other projects (for instance through supplier groups who have operations in multiple landscapes) then that could be a good option, especially if their direct supply landscapes do not have much forest left to protect.
IS THE FCF GRANTEE ALLOWED TO CERTIFIED THEIR AREA FOR CARBON CREDIT?
We do not put restrictions on other sources of funding for the conservation projects we support; indeed carbon credits could be a good option to diversify sources of income.
HOW MUCH FUNDING CAN A PROJECT RECEIVE?
Projects present a total budget for all of their conservation activities in the area being proposed for FCF support. They also show what other funding they already have. FCF can fund up to $32 per hectare per year, but usually the amount the project needs is much less than that.
WHAT ARE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR PROJECT AREAS IN TERMS OF SIZE, TENURE, AND TYPE OF LAND COVER?
The full details are available Project Eligibility Criteria, but in summary, the conservation area must:
· Be natural forest (very few non-native species – no more than 15% of basal area)
· At least 500 contiguous hectares in size, and
· Have tenure which allows conservation for at least the next 20 years
· Have achieved its conservation status granted in the last 5 years
WHAT ARE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR GRANTEES?
The full details are available Project Eligibility Criteria, but in summary, the organizations we fund must:
· Be a legally-registered community-based organisation, private company, private individual, NGO, research institution, university, or religious entity.
· Own the land or have legal use or management rights
· Have adequate human and financial resources to ensure protection of the area and active involvement of the surrounding community in conservation activities
· Have a policy that they will not deforest any natural forest areas
· Demonstrate a basic understanding of risks to the project
WHAT TYPES OF ACTIVITIES DO YOU FUND?
FCF funds can be used for the following activities:
• Management and monitoring of the site, including for biodiversity (SMART or equivalent) and social impact
• Land taxes, licenses, or permits for the conservation area
• Human resources and overheads related to conservation
• Restoration with naturally occurring local forest species
• Re-introduction of native fauna
• Development of income-generation activities within the site (must comply with box on right)
• Development of income-generation activities with local communities off-site (must be part of a plan to gain support from communities for conservation)
• Legal support to finalize conservation-based tenure
WHAT ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES CAN OCCUR INSIDE THE CONSERVATION AREA?
Commercial and subsistence activities which do not harm the long-term integrity of the forest are allowed. This includes, for species which are not rare, threatened, or endangered species: sustainable collection of non-timber forest products, sustainable fishing, subsistence logging, and subsistence hunting. It also includes low-impact tourism.
The following activities are not allowed inside conservation areas supported by the FCF:
• Commercial logging or hunting
• Hunting, fishing, or harvesting of rare or threatened species
• Planting of non-native species
• Cultivation of non-native species (except when already planted and <15% of area)